ChiR24 Unreal MCP vs CodeCraft

In-depth architectural comparison of the ChiR24 Unreal MCP and CodeCraft MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ChiR24 Unreal MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: manage_asset, manage_blueprint, control_actor.

Explore ChiR24 Unreal MCP Details

Choose CodeCraft when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CodeCraft Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ChiR24 Unreal MCP Gaming	CodeCraft Gaming
Summary	Control Unreal Engine to browse assets, import content, and manage levels and sequences. Automate…	Checks whether generated Minecraft Bedrock content will actually load. Nine read-only tools.
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chir24-unreal-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "unreal-engine-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codecraft": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "codecraft"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons