CodeCraft vs Flutter MCP Toolkit

In-depth architectural comparison of the CodeCraft and Flutter MCP Toolkit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose CodeCraft when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CodeCraft Details

Choose Flutter MCP Toolkit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Flutter MCP Toolkit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	CodeCraft Gaming	Flutter MCP Toolkit Gaming
Summary	Checks whether generated Minecraft Bedrock content will actually load. Nine read-only tools.	Inspect and drive Flutter debug apps/games: semantic snapshots, search, and custom client tools
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codecraft": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "codecraft"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "flutter-mcp-toolkit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons