ArXiv vs Arxivsub MCP — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
ArXiv vs Arxivsub MCP
A side-by-side look at the ArXiv and Arxivsub MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose ArXiv for research work over a hosted endpoint; choose Arxivsub MCP for research as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose ArXiv when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
You want tools like arxiv_search, arxiv_get_paper, arxiv_daily_digest.
library_saveSave/update a paper in your personal library — notes, reading status, collections.
library_listList your saved papers and collections.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
ArXiv is categorized under Research and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Arxivsub MCP belongs to Research and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick ArXiv for research work and Arxivsub MCP for research.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
ArXiv has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Arxivsub MCP has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add arxiv and arxivsub-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, ArXiv has a quality signal of 43/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Arxivsub MCP has 49/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.