ArXiv vs Papers

In-depth architectural comparison of the ArXiv and Papers MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ArXiv when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: arxiv_search, arxiv_get_paper, arxiv_daily_digest.

Explore ArXiv Details

Choose Papers when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: 34 hosted MCP tools, Public paper search, Citation graph access.

Explore Papers Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ArXiv Research	Papers Research
Summary
Category & Scope	Research	Research
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arxiv": {
      "url": "https://arxiv-mcp.atlasword.workers.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "papers": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agentpub"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons