MCP Local WP vs Quarry

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Local WP and Quarry MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose MCP Local WP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: sql, params, table.

Explore MCP Local WP Details

Choose Quarry when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Quarry Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M MCP Local WP Databases	Quarry Databases
Summary	WordPress database access via Local by Flywheel. Execute read-only MySQL queries and inspect schema.	Safety-railed database access for agents: Postgres, MySQL, Redis. Read-only by default.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-local-wp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@verygoodplugins/mcp-local-wp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quarry": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "quarry-db"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons