Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
MCP Local WP vs Ydb MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Local WP and Ydb MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
MCP Local WP
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Ydb MCP
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose MCP Local WP if you need specialized Databases tools running via a local process. Choose Ydb MCP if your workspace requires Databases integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
M
Choose MCP Local WP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: sql, params, table.
Choose Ydb MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
- You have access to required keys:
YDB_ENDPOINT, YDB_DATABASE, YDB_AUTH_MODE, YDB_LOGIN, YDB_PASSWORD, YDB_ACCESS_TOKEN, YDB_SA_KEY_FILE. - Primary tools included: ydb_query, sql, ydb_query_with_params.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
MCP Local WP Tools (3)
sql
params
table
Ydb MCP Tools (10)
ydb_query
Run a SQL query against a YDB database
sql
SQL query string to execute
ydb_query_with_params
Run a parameterized SQL query with JSON parameters
params
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
MCP Local WP Configuration
Ydb MCP Configuration