MySQL MCP vs Quarry

In-depth architectural comparison of the MySQL MCP and Quarry MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose MySQL MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MySQL MCP Details

Choose Quarry when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Quarry Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M MySQL MCP Databases	Quarry Databases
Summary	MCP server for one MySQL database: schema, read-only queries and guarded writes.	Safety-railed database access for agents: Postgres, MySQL, Redis. Read-only by default.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mysql-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mysql-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quarry": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "quarry-db"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons