Lazaretto Mcp vs Arc Gate Mcp

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers โ€” install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Lazaretto Mcp logo
Lazaretto Mcp
jamesdfinance-dev
๐Ÿ”’ Security
Arc Gate Mcp logo
Arc Gate Mcp
9hannahnine-jpg
๐Ÿ”’ Security
SummaryCheck whether anything you depend on is known malware, before an agent installs it. checklockfile takes a package-lock.json, yarn.lock or pnpm-lock.yaml and matches every pinned version against published malicious-package advisories in one call, free and with no API key, catching compromised releases like chalk@5.6.1 while leaving their clean releases alone. scanartifact adds deterministic behavioral analysis (no LLM in the serving path) for credential theft, exfiltration, obfuscation, prompt injection and install-time droppers, with the file, line and evidence that triggered it; verdicts are SHA-256-bound so you can re-verify what landed on disk. Paid scans settle at $0.03 USDC on Base (x402) or prepaid credits. npx lazaretto-mcpRuntime governance for MCP tool calls. Blocks prompt injection and capability abuse before tool results reach your agent.
Quality signal51/100 (Fair)47/100 (Fair)
Install pathRemote ยท highuvx ยท high
Engagement 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2
Toolsknown_bad_lookupscan_artifactRuntime governance proxy for MCP tool callsMultiple policy modes (balanced, browser_agent, finance_agent, rag_assistant, strict)Blocks prompt injection and capability abuseSupports integration with various MCP serversAvailable as a Python package and CLI tool
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Lazaretto McpView Arc Gate Mcp
More alternatives to Lazaretto McpMore alternatives to Arc Gate McpSecurity categoryCanonical compare URL

Other servers like Lazaretto Mcp