Arc Gate Mcp vs Lazaretto Mcp

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers โ€” install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Arc Gate Mcp logo
Arc Gate Mcp
9hannahnine-jpg
๐Ÿ”’ Security
Lazaretto Mcp logo
Lazaretto Mcp
jamesdfinance-dev
๐Ÿ”’ Security
SummaryRuntime governance for MCP tool calls. Blocks prompt injection and capability abuse before tool results reach your agent.Check whether anything you depend on is known malware, before an agent installs it. checklockfile takes a package-lock.json, yarn.lock or pnpm-lock.yaml and matches every pinned version against published malicious-package advisories in one call, free and with no API key, catching compromised releases like chalk@5.6.1 while leaving their clean releases alone. scanartifact adds deterministic behavioral analysis (no LLM in the serving path) for credential theft, exfiltration, obfuscation, prompt injection and install-time droppers, with the file, line and evidence that triggered it; verdicts are SHA-256-bound so you can re-verify what landed on disk. Paid scans settle at $0.03 USDC on Base (x402) or prepaid credits. npx lazaretto-mcp
Quality signal47/100 (Fair)51/100 (Fair)
Install pathuvx ยท highRemote ยท high
Engagement 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
ToolsRuntime governance proxy for MCP tool callsMultiple policy modes (balanced, browser_agent, finance_agent, rag_assistant, strict)Blocks prompt injection and capability abuseSupports integration with various MCP serversAvailable as a Python package and CLI toolknown_bad_lookupscan_artifact
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Arc Gate McpView Lazaretto Mcp
More alternatives to Arc Gate McpMore alternatives to Lazaretto McpSecurity category

Other servers like Arc Gate Mcp