Lazaretto Mcp vs Mcp Audit

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Lazaretto Mcp logo
Lazaretto Mcp
jamesdfinance-dev
🔒 Security
Mcp Audit logo
Mcp Audit
P4ST4S
🔒 Security
SummaryCheck whether anything you depend on is known malware, before an agent installs it. checklockfile takes a package-lock.json, yarn.lock or pnpm-lock.yaml and matches every pinned version against published malicious-package advisories in one call, free and with no API key, catching compromised releases like chalk@5.6.1 while leaving their clean releases alone. scanartifact adds deterministic behavioral analysis (no LLM in the serving path) for credential theft, exfiltration, obfuscation, prompt injection and install-time droppers, with the file, line and evidence that triggered it; verdicts are SHA-256-bound so you can re-verify what landed on disk. Paid scans settle at $0.03 USDC on Base (x402) or prepaid credits. npx lazaretto-mcpTransparent Go proxy that intercepts, signs, rate-limits, redacts, and audits all MCP JSON-RPC tool calls without modifying client or server.
Quality signal51/100 (Fair)51/100 (Fair)
Install pathRemote · highnpx · high
Engagement 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 7
Toolsknown_bad_lookupscan_artifactTransparent proxy for MCP JSON-RPC trafficSigned audit trail generationPayload redaction of sensitive dataAllow/deny policy enforcementPer-tool rate limitingLocal read-only dashboard and Prometheus metrics
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Lazaretto McpView Mcp Audit
More alternatives to Lazaretto McpMore alternatives to Mcp AuditSecurity category

Other servers like Lazaretto Mcp