Inbody API MCP vs Gget MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Inbody API MCP and Gget MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Inbody API MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_profile, get_scan_count, list_scans.

Explore Inbody API MCP Details

Choose Gget MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: gget_search, gget_info, gget_seq.

Explore Gget MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Inbody API MCP Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics	Gget MCP longevity-genie Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics
Summary	MCP server for InBody body-composition data — scans, body fat, muscle mass, body water	MCP server providing a powerful bioinformatics toolkit for genomics queries and analysis, wrapping the popular gget library.
Category & Scope	Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inbody-api-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "inbody-api-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "longevity-genie-gget-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "without"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons