HaloPSA vs Crisphive MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the HaloPSA and Crisphive MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose HaloPSA when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Support & Service Management domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore HaloPSA Details

Choose Crisphive MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Support & Service Management domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Crisphive MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	HaloPSA Support & Service Management	Crisphive MCP Support & Service Management
Summary	MCP server for HaloPSA — clients, tickets, and PSA workflows via the HaloPSA REST API.	Field service management for AI agents: booking, scheduling, dispatch, work orders, CRM, fleet.
Category & Scope	Support & Service Management	Support & Service Management

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "halopsa-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@wyre-ai/halopsa-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-79": {
      "url": "https://api.crisphive.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons