Google Analytics MCP vs MVR API Minimum Via… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Google Analytics MCP vs MVR API Minimum Viable Relationships
In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Analytics MCP and MVR API Minimum Viable Relationships MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Google Analytics MCP
Marketing · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
MVR API Minimum Viable Relationships
Marketing · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Google Analytics MCP if you need specialized Marketing tools running via a local process. Choose MVR API Minimum Viable Relationships if your workspace requires Marketing integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Google Analytics MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Google Analytics MCP is categorized under Marketing and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, MVR API Minimum Viable Relationships belongs to Marketing using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Google Analytics MCP when you need capabilities focused on marketing and MVR API Minimum Viable Relationships when you require tools for marketing.
