Attom vs Zillow MCP — Property… — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Attom vs Zillow MCP — Property Data, Zestimates & Listings for AI Agents
In-depth architectural comparison of the Attom and Zillow MCP — Property Data, Zestimates & Listings for AI Agents MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Attom
Real Estate · Local stdio
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Zillow MCP — Property Data, Zestimates & Listings for AI Agents
Real Estate · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Attom if you need specialized Real Estate tools running via a local process. Choose Zillow MCP — Property Data, Zestimates & Listings for AI Agents if your workspace requires Real Estate integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Attom when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Real Estate domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Attom is categorized under Real Estate and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Zillow MCP — Property Data, Zestimates & Listings for AI Agents belongs to Real Estate using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Attom when you need capabilities focused on real estate and Zillow MCP — Property Data, Zestimates & Listings for AI Agents when you require tools for real estate.