In-depth architectural comparison of the ArXiv and Thoth MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
ArXiv
Research · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Thoth
Research · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose ArXiv if you need specialized Research tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Thoth if your workspace requires Research integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose ArXiv when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
ArXiv is categorized under Research and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Thoth belongs to Research using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select ArXiv when you need capabilities focused on research and Thoth when you require tools for research.