Amazon DSP MCP Server vs PushEngage

In-depth architectural comparison of the Amazon DSP MCP Server and PushEngage MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Amazon DSP MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Amazon DSP MCP Server Details

Choose PushEngage when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: pushengage_auth_login, pushengage_auth_status, pushengage_auth_logout.

Explore PushEngage Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Amazon DSP MCP Server Marketing	PushEngage Marketing
Summary	Amazon DSP management — CRUD, async reports, targeting, and audience management	Send push notifications, build audiences, and view campaign analytics from PushEngage.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "amazon-dsp-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://gads.your-domain.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pushengage": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pushengage/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons