MisarMail MCP Server vs PushEngage

In-depth architectural comparison of the MisarMail MCP Server and PushEngage MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MisarMail MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: send_email, list_emails, get_email.

Explore MisarMail MCP Server Details

Choose PushEngage when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: pushengage_auth_login, pushengage_auth_status, pushengage_auth_logout.

Explore PushEngage Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MisarMail MCP Server Marketing	PushEngage Marketing
Summary	Send transactional email, run campaigns, manage contacts and automations, audit deliverability.	Send push notifications, build audiences, and view campaign analytics from PushEngage.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "misarmail-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@misarmail/mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pushengage": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pushengage/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons