Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
X402 Gateway vs Agentery
In-depth architectural comparison of the X402 Gateway and Agentery MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
X402 Gateway
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Agentery
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose X402 Gateway if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a local process. Choose Agentery if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
X
Choose X402 Gateway when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
A
Choose Agentery when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
X402 Gateway Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Agentery Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
X402 Gateway Configuration
Agentery Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to X402 GatewayMore alternatives to AgenteryFinance & Fintech category hubCanonical compare URL