WP Agent — WordPress… vs Opinly — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude vs Opinly
In-depth architectural comparison of the WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude and Opinly MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude
Marketing · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Opinly
Marketing · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude if you need specialized Marketing tools running via a local process. Choose Opinly if your workspace requires Marketing integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
W
Choose WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude is categorized under Marketing and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Opinly belongs to Marketing using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude when you need capabilities focused on marketing and Opinly when you require tools for marketing.
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude vs Crawlie
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude vs Facebook Ads Mcp Server