Opinly vs WP Agent — WordPress… — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Opinly vs WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude
In-depth architectural comparison of the Opinly and WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Opinly
Marketing · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude
Marketing · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Opinly if you need specialized Marketing tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude if your workspace requires Marketing integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
O
Choose Opinly when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Opinly is categorized under Marketing and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude belongs to Marketing using local stdio subprocess. Select Opinly when you need capabilities focused on marketing and WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude when you require tools for marketing.
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude vs Crawlie
WP Agent — WordPress publishing & management with Claude vs Facebook Ads Mcp Server