Windows Computer Use… vs Realhands — Real Desk… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Windows Computer Use MCP vs Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use
In-depth architectural comparison of the Windows Computer Use MCP and Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Windows Computer Use MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Windows Computer Use MCP if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Windows Computer Use MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Windows Computer Use MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Windows Computer Use MCP when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use when you require tools for developer tools.