Realhands — Real Desk… vs Windows Computer Use… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use vs Windows Computer Use MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use and Windows Computer Use MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Windows Computer Use MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Windows Computer Use MCP if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Windows Computer Use MCP belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Realhands — Real Desktop Computer Use when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Windows Computer Use MCP when you require tools for developer tools.