Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
VMware Storage vs VMware NSX
In-depth architectural comparison of the VMware Storage and VMware NSX MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
VMware Storage
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
VMware NSX
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose VMware Storage if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose VMware NSX if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
V
Choose VMware Storage when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
V
Choose VMware NSX when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
VMware Storage Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
VMware NSX Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
VMware Storage Configuration
VMware NSX Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to VMware StorageMore alternatives to VMware NSXDeveloper Tools category hubCanonical compare URL