Umami Compass vs Coder

In-depth architectural comparison of the Umami Compass and Coder MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

U

Choose Umami Compass when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Umami Compass Details

Choose Coder when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Coder Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	U Umami Compass Developer Tools	Coder Developer Tools
Summary	Secure Umami Analytics MCP server for Cloud and self-hosted deployments	Manage Coder workspaces, templates, and cloud development environments
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "umami-compass": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "umami-compass"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "coder": {
      "url": "https://coder.com#gh-light-mode-only"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons