Trip2g vs Reverie

In-depth architectural comparison of the Trip2g and Reverie MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Trip2g when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Trip2g Details

R

Choose Reverie when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Reverie Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Trip2g Knowledge & Memory	R Reverie Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Serve a folder of Markdown notes as an MCP server: hybrid search, reading, and sourced answers.	Graph memory that dreams: Neo4j knowledge-graph memory for AI agents with hybrid search
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trip2g": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "trip2g"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reverie": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@knowall-ai/mcp-neo4j-agent-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons