Tebra vs Dicom MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tebra and Dicom MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Tebra when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: tebra_search_patients, tebra_get_patient, tebra_create_patient.

Explore Tebra Details

Choose Dicom MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Patient, study, series, and instance queries, Encapsulated PDF text extraction, C-MOVE transfers for studies and series.

Explore Dicom MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Tebra Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics	Dicom MCP ChristianHinge Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics
Summary	MCP server for Tebra/Kareo practice management — patients, billing, scheduling, FHIR (45 tools)	DICOM integration to query, read, and move medical images and reports from PACS and other DICOM compliant systems.
Category & Scope	Biology, Medicine and Bioinformatics

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tebra": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tebra-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "christianhinge-dicom-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "dicom-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons