Tarot MCP Server by RoxyAPI vs Astro

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tarot MCP Server by RoxyAPI and Astro MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Tarot MCP Server by RoxyAPI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Spirituality & Esoterica domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tarot MCP Server by RoxyAPI Details

Choose Astro when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Spirituality & Esoterica domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Astro Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Tarot MCP Server by RoxyAPI Spirituality & Esoterica	Astro Spirituality & Esoterica
Summary	Tarot card meanings, spreads and seeded reproducible readings for AI agents, one API key.	Multi-tradition astrology. 19 modes, 18 tools. Deterministic ephemeris engine.
Category & Scope	Spirituality & Esoterica	Spirituality & Esoterica

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tarot-mcp-server-by-roxyapi": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tarot-mcp-server-by-roxyapi"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "astro": {
      "url": "https://astro-api-a2rc.onrender.com/mcp/sse"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons