Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World vs Hashloom

In-depth architectural comparison of the Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World and Hashloom MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World Details

Choose Hashloom when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hashloom Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World Legal	Hashloom Legal
Summary	Bounded agent exploration with persistent progress, deterministic receipts, and return contracts.	Content-addressed contracts and a verification cache that cut agent context by skipping proven code.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "superstimulus-quest-bounded-agent-world": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "superstimulus-quest-bounded-agent-world"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hashloom": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "hashloom"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons