Hashloom vs Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hashloom and Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Hashloom when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hashloom Details

S

Choose Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Hashloom Legal	S Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World Legal
Summary	Content-addressed contracts and a verification cache that cut agent context by skipping proven code.	Bounded agent exploration with persistent progress, deterministic receipts, and return contracts.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hashloom": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "hashloom"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "superstimulus-quest-bounded-agent-world": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "superstimulus-quest-bounded-agent-world"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons