Memex vs Obsidian Codex Mcp

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
M
Memex
STiFLeR7
🧠 Knowledge & Memory
O
Obsidian Codex Mcp
dot-RealityTest
🧠 Knowledge & Memory
SummaryDeveloper context continuity system. Watches your git repos and builds a temporal knowledge graph of modules, symbols, decisions, and open problems via Graphiti + Neo4j, then serves it to any AI coding agent over MCP. Every edge carries a validity window and a confidence score that decays over time. 12 tools across read and write. Install via npx -y stifler-memex-mcp. MIT licensed.Local-first Obsidian vault MCP server for Codex, Claude Desktop, and other MCP clients. Works directly with markdown files, no Obsidian plugin, API key, cloud service, or running Obsidian app required. Includes read-only mode, backup-on-write, path isolation, and setup examples.
Quality signal27/100 (Emerging)25/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · highpip · high
Engagement 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 9
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView MemexView Obsidian Codex Mcp
More alternatives to MemexMore alternatives to Obsidian Codex McpKnowledge & Memory categoryCanonical compare URL

Other servers like Memex