SQL Server MCP (Windows) vs Orionbelt Semantic Layer

In-depth architectural comparison of the SQL Server MCP (Windows) and Orionbelt Semantic Layer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose SQL Server MCP (Windows) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SQL Server MCP (Windows) Details

Choose Orionbelt Semantic Layer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Orionbelt Semantic Layer Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	SQL Server MCP (Windows) Databases	Orionbelt Semantic Layer Databases
Summary	SQL Server MCP with RAG capabilities for Windows (native ODBC support)	API-first semantic layer MCP server compiling YAML models into dialect-specific SQL
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sql-server-mcp-windows": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@tharanabopearachchi/sql-server-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orionbelt-semantic-layer": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "orionbelt-semantic-layer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons