SpriteCook vs Wavedash

In-depth architectural comparison of the SpriteCook and Wavedash MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose SpriteCook when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SpriteCook Details

Choose Wavedash when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Wavedash Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	SpriteCook Gaming	Wavedash Gaming
Summary	Generate game assets with AI for 2D games, including sprites, tilesets, and animations.	Wavedash docs and workflow guidance for building and publishing browser games.
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spritecook": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "spritecook-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wavedash": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wavedash"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons