Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP vs Unpaywall

In-depth architectural comparison of the Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP and Unpaywall MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP Details

Choose Unpaywall when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Unpaywall Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP Research	Unpaywall Research
Summary	Discover the latest arXiv papers by category and keyword. Control how many results you get to spee…	Unpaywall MCP — open-access lookup for scholarly papers (free, no key)
Category & Scope	Research	Research
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shoumikdc-arxiv-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "shoumikdc-arxiv-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unpaywall-2": {
      "url": "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons