What is the key difference between Datacite and Unpaywall?

Datacite belongs to the Research category with local stdio execution, while Unpaywall belongs to the Research category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Datacite or Unpaywall in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Datacite and Unpaywall free or paid?

Datacite operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Unpaywall operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Datacite lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Unpaywall lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Datacite and Unpaywall together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Datacite vs Unpaywall

In-depth architectural comparison of the Datacite and Unpaywall MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Datacite

Research · Local stdio

Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Unpaywall

Research · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Datacite if you need specialized Research tools running via a local process. Choose Unpaywall if your workspace requires Research integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Datacite when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Datacite Details

Choose Unpaywall when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Unpaywall Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Datacite Research	Unpaywall Research
Summary	DataCite MCP — DOIs for research datasets (free, no auth)	Unpaywall MCP — open-access lookup for scholarly papers (free, no key)
Category & Scope	Research	Research
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Datacite Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Unpaywall Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Datacite Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "datacite": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-datacite"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Unpaywall Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unpaywall-2": {
      "url": "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Datacite is categorized under Research and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Unpaywall belongs to Research using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Datacite when you need capabilities focused on research and Unpaywall when you require tools for research.

More alternatives to Datacite More alternatives to Unpaywall Research category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Datacite

Popular comparisons with Unpaywall

Unpaywall vs Search Papers