Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Setlist Fm vs WOCLUB Protocol Gym
In-depth architectural comparison of the Setlist Fm and WOCLUB Protocol Gym MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Setlist Fm
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
WOCLUB Protocol Gym
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Setlist Fm if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose WOCLUB Protocol Gym if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
S
Choose Setlist Fm when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
W
Choose WOCLUB Protocol Gym when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Setlist Fm Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
WOCLUB Protocol Gym Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Setlist Fm Configuration
WOCLUB Protocol Gym Configuration