Screenshot vs Mup — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Screenshot vs Mup
In-depth architectural comparison of the Screenshot and Mup MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Screenshot
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 32/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Mup
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 32/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Screenshot if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Mup if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
S
Choose Screenshot when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Screenshot is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Mup belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Screenshot when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Mup when you require tools for developer tools.