Screen Control vs Cryptair MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Screen Control and Cryptair MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Screen Control when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Screen Control Details

Choose Cryptair MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cryptair MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Screen Control Developer Tools	Cryptair MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Safety-gated computer use for AI agents: screen OCR and vision, mouse, keyboard, window control.	Tamper-evident attestation tools for AI agents — on-chain receipts on Hedera Hashgraph mainnet.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "screen-control": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "screen-control"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cryptair-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@cryptair/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons