SCORM Packager (HTML → SCORM 2004) vs Packkit

In-depth architectural comparison of the SCORM Packager (HTML → SCORM 2004) and Packkit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose SCORM Packager (HTML → SCORM 2004) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SCORM Packager (HTML → SCORM 2004) Details

Choose Packkit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Packkit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	SCORM Packager (HTML → SCORM 2004) Developer Tools	Packkit Developer Tools
Summary	Turn HTML or Claude Design bundles into LMS-ready SCORM 2004 packages — offline, tracked.	Scaffold modern npm packages, CLIs, services and apps as a native tool for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scorm-packager-html-scorm-2004": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "scorm-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "packkit-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "npx"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons