SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner vs MCP Shodan
In-depth architectural comparison of the SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner and MCP Shodan MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner
Security · Local stdio
Quality: 29/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
MCP Shodan
Security · Local stdio
Quality: 61/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose MCP Shodan if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Generate SBOMs, scan vulnerabilities, and analyze dependencies from Git repos via MCP.
MCP server for querying the Shodan API and Shodan CVEDB. This server provides tools for IP lookups, device searches, DNS lookups, vulnerability queries, CPE lookups, and more.
SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, MCP Shodan belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner when you need capabilities focused on security and MCP Shodan when you require tools for security.