In-depth architectural comparison of the Mobb Vibe Shield MCP and SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Mobb Vibe Shield MCP
Security · Local stdio
Quality: 59/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner
Security · Local stdio
Quality: 29/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Mobb Vibe Shield MCP if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Mobb Vibe Shield MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
You have access to required keys: API_KEY, API_URL, MVS_AUTO_FIX.
Primary tools included: Supports SAST tools: Checkmarx, CodeQL, Fortify, Snyk, Two modes: Scan (runs SAST scan) and Analyze (uses existing SAST report), Generates automated code fixes for detected vulnerabilities.
Mobb Vibe Shield identifies and remediates vulnerabilities in both human and AI-written code, ensuring your applications remain secure without slowing development.
Generate SBOMs, scan vulnerabilities, and analyze dependencies from Git repos via MCP.
Mobb Vibe Shield MCP is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Mobb Vibe Shield MCP when you need capabilities focused on security and SBOMApp SBOM Generator & Vulnerability Scanner when you require tools for security.