RetriEVAL vs CompletionKit

In-depth architectural comparison of the RetriEVAL and CompletionKit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose RetriEVAL when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore RetriEVAL Details

Choose CompletionKit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CompletionKit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	RetriEVAL Developer Tools	CompletionKit Developer Tools
Summary	LLM evals as MCP tools: score outputs for faithfulness, relevancy, and hallucination.	Prompt evals over MCP: run a prompt on your dataset, score each output 1-5 with an LLM judge.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "retrieval": {
      "url": "https://retrieval-mcp.com)**"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "completionkit": {
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/homemade-software-inc/completion-kit/main/docs/logo.png"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons