Reporting Ninja vs Google Analytics MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Reporting Ninja and Google Analytics MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Reporting Ninja when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Reporting Ninja Details

Choose Google Analytics MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Analytics MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Reporting Ninja Marketing	Google Analytics MCP Marketing
Summary	Read-only access to your Reporting Ninja marketing and analytics data across 20+ ad platforms.	An MCP server that provides [describe what your server does]
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reporting-ninja": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "reporting-ninja"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-analytics-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "google-analytics-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons