Rawmem vs Lotor

In-depth architectural comparison of the Rawmem and Lotor MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Rawmem when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Rawmem Details

Choose Lotor when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lotor Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Rawmem Developer Tools	Lotor Developer Tools
Summary	Read-only MCP access to a local append-only evidence ledger for AI agent sessions.	A local receipt and approval gate for AI agent sessions. The agent can act, but it cannot sign.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rawmem": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "rawmem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lotor": {
      "url": "https://ikeanalytics.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons