Quarry vs QueryBear

In-depth architectural comparison of the Quarry and QueryBear MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Quarry when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Quarry Details

Q

Choose QueryBear when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore QueryBear Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Quarry Databases	Q QueryBear Databases
Summary	Safety-railed database access for agents: Postgres, MySQL, Redis. Read-only by default.	Safe, read-only Postgres and MySQL access for AI agents. Audit log + column-level controls.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quarry": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "quarry-db"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "querybear": {
      "url": "https://querybear.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons