Premium Domains vs Entscheidsuche — Schw… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Premium Domains vs Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
In-depth architectural comparison of the Premium Domains and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Premium Domains
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Premium Domains if you need specialized Legal tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Premium Domains when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Search Atom.com's curated marketplace of premium, brandable domains by concept, industry, or style. Every result is a real listing with a buy-now price.
check_domain_availability
Check whether a specific domain is available, taken, or a premium listing; suggests curated alternatives when taken.
generate_domain_names
Invent new brandable name candidates for a concept, grounded against live availability and Atom.com inventory — every result is actually obtainable.
appraise_domain
Estimate the market value of a domain with reasoning and comparable sales. Always an estimate, not an offer.
get_domain_details
Full detail record for a single Atom.com listing — the deep-dive after picking a name.
screen_trademark_conflicts
Preliminary trademark-conflict screen against public USPTO records. Not legal advice.
get_checkout_link
Pre-filled, authenticated Atom.com checkout URL so the user can complete payment on Atom.com. Charges nothing by itself.
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Tools (6)
search
Volltextsuche mit Lucene-Syntax. Filter nach Entscheiddatum, Scrape-Datum, Hierarchie (Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) und Sprache. Sortierung nach Relevanz, Entscheiddatum oder Scrape-Datum. Paginierung über `next_cursor` / `search_after`. Aggregationen für Facetten-Auswertung.
search_by_case_number
Exakte Phrasensuche nach Geschäftsnummern, Aktenzeichen und BGE-Zitaten (z.B. `BGE 142 III 1`, `6B_1234/2025`, `5A_396/2015`). Setzt die Nummer automatisch in Anführungszeichen.
fetch_document
Vollständigen Entscheid samt Volltext anhand der ID abrufen.
list_hierarchy
Hierarchie-IDs (Bund / Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) mit Trefferzahlen.
list_facets
Hierarchischer Facetten-Baum mit lokalisierten Labels in DE/FR/IT.
server_info
Versions- und Konfigurationsinformationen.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Premium Domains is categorized under Legal and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Premium Domains when you need capabilities focused on legal and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when you require tools for legal.