What is the key difference between PostSyncer and Antwork?

PostSyncer belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Antwork belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install PostSyncer or Antwork in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are PostSyncer and Antwork free or paid?

PostSyncer operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Antwork operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

PostSyncer lists 0 tools with 0 views and 1 GitHub stars. Antwork lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both PostSyncer and Antwork together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

PostSyncer vs Antwork

In-depth architectural comparison of the PostSyncer and Antwork MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

PostSyncer

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Antwork

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose PostSyncer if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Antwork if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose PostSyncer when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PostSyncer Details

Choose Antwork when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Antwork Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P PostSyncer Developer Tools	Antwork Developer Tools
Summary	Schedule, publish, and analyze social media posts across 11 platforms from any MCP client.	Draft, schedule, and publish social posts for your workspace straight from your AI.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

PostSyncer Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Antwork Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

PostSyncer Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "postsyncer": {
      "url": "https://postsyncer.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Antwork Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "antwork-2": {
      "url": "https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

PostSyncer is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Antwork belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select PostSyncer when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Antwork when you require tools for developer tools.