Antwork vs Postey

In-depth architectural comparison of the Antwork and Postey MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Antwork when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Antwork Details

P

Choose Postey when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Postey Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Antwork Developer Tools	P Postey Developer Tools
Summary	Draft, schedule, and publish social posts for your workspace straight from your AI.	Draft, schedule and publish social posts to nine platforms from any AI agent.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "antwork-2": {
      "url": "https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-skills"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "postey": {
      "url": "https://www.postey.ai"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons