Postmcp MCP Server vs Autoposting

In-depth architectural comparison of the Postmcp MCP Server and Autoposting MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Postmcp MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Postmcp MCP Server Details

A

Choose Autoposting when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Autoposting Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Postmcp MCP Server Social Media	A Autoposting Social Media
Summary	Publish and schedule posts to LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Bluesky and YouTube Shorts.	Schedule, generate and publish social posts to X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Threads and YouTube
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "postmcp-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@postmcpai/server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "autoposting": {
      "url": "https://docs.autoposting.ai/mcp/overview"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons