Autoposting vs Postmcp MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Autoposting and Postmcp MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Autoposting when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Autoposting Details

Choose Postmcp MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Postmcp MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Autoposting Social Media	Postmcp MCP Server Social Media
Summary	Schedule, generate and publish social posts to X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Threads and YouTube	Publish and schedule posts to LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Bluesky and YouTube Shorts.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "autoposting": {
      "url": "https://docs.autoposting.ai/mcp/overview"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "postmcp-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@postmcpai/server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons