MCP Datalink vs Universal Db MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Datalink and Universal Db MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Datalink when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_databases, list_tables, describe_table.

Explore MCP Datalink Details

Choose Universal Db MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query, schema, explain.

Explore Universal Db MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Datalink pilat Databases	Universal Db MCP Databases
Summary	MCP server for secure database access (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) with parameterized queries and schema inspection	Security-first MCP server for PostgreSQL, SQLite, MySQL, DuckDB with SQL injection prevention.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pilat-mcp-datalink": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pilat/mcp-datalink"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "universal-db-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "universal-db-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons